Every plan, including Free · v1.0.0
Compliance & Regulatory
Regulatory change tracking, policy gap-closure and product/advertising review
- Protocols
- 2
- Skills
- 11
- Public sources
- 35
- Workflows
- 1
The How this was made tab: the plan, the sub-agents that ran, the checks that passed and the redactions applied before any model saw the prompt.
What it does
Tracks regulatory change and assesses the firm or its clients against regulator rules.
Typical tasks
- 01Draft a factual, numbered response to a regulator
- 02Diff a new rule against the firm's policy library
- 03Assess a client's onboarding process against a rule change
Best for
- COLPs and compliance officers.
- Risk managers tracking regulatory exposure.
- Practice heads assessing operational impact.
How it works
From task to memo, in 5 steps.
Every step is recorded under How this was made on the finished run, with a pass, a needs a look, or a failure against each check. Nothing here is a description of intent. It is what the software does.
01
Configure the focus
Configure your focus: which regulators, practice areas and topics matter most.
02
Monitor on a schedule
Monitoring runs on a schedule and searches for recent regulatory changes and consultations.
03
Score materiality
Each change is scored one to five for scope, penalty risk and implementation effort, and mapped to the affected practice areas.
04
Review the prioritised list
Review the prioritised list with materiality scores and impact assessments.
05
Request an action plan
Request action plans for high-materiality changes: remediation steps, deadlines and owners.
Governed by
2 protocols.
Protocols run before and during the work: they plan, confirm the jurisdiction, screen personal data, check privilege. Gates run after, on the output, and they are code rather than a model's opinion. A failed gate is shown, never hidden.
Protocols
- 01Planning ProtocolMaps out the plan before any work starts: which sources answer which part of the task, in what order.
- 02Privilege ReviewAssesses the output for privileged or confidential material and flags disclosure risk before it is circulated.
Skills
- SRA Compliance Rules
- EU AI Act Compliance
- Data Protection (UK GDPR & Privacy)
- Financial Services (FCA)
- Regulatory Response Drafting
- NIST AI RMF Mapping
- ISO 42001 Controls
- Policy Library Indexing
- ASA/CAP Advertising & Consumer Law (UK)
- Regulatory Diff & Gap Method
- Product Launch Review
What comes back
A document with its working attached.
- 01Summary
- 02Obligation & evidence
- 03Gap & severity
- 04Remediation owner
Sources it may cite
- Privy Council
- legislation.gov.uk
- FCA
- FCA Handbook
- PRA Rulebook
- Bank of England
- SRA
- Bar Standards Board
- CILEx Regulation
- Law Society
- Law Society of Scotland
- SDT
- ICO
- ASA
- All 74
Connectors in the catalogue
Catalogue tiles, not live integrations today. Documents are uploaded to the matter.
- Atlassian
- Asana
- OpenLaw
Try it
Three tasks to start with.
These are the prompts the agent suggests inside the product. Paste your own document under any of them.
Diff the FCA Handbook against our policies
Diff the FCA Handbook against our policy library for changes since January. For each change, tell me which of our policies it touches, whether we are compliant today, and what needs to be updated.
Assess us against the SRA Code
Assess our current position against the SRA Code of Conduct. Produce a risk register: obligation, our evidence, gap, severity, and the remediation owner.
What changed in EU AI Act obligations
Summarise what has changed in our EU AI Act obligations in the last quarter, which of our systems are in scope, and the deadlines we are now working to.
What it does not do yet
- Automatic remediation is not yet built: action plans are generated for a compliance officer to assign and track.
Workflows