The bundle reads itself. You check the quotes.

Load the documents into a review grid, apply the seeded playbook, and check the quote behind the cells that look wrong rather than rereading the whole file.

Paralegals and trainees

Start free Book a 20-minute walkthrough

No credit card required

Document Review · Hartwell matter · contract screen0/12 filled

Document	Parties and effective dateTEXT	Term and renewalTEXT	Limitation of liabilityTEXT	Governing lawTEXT
nda-hartwell-meridian.txt
saas-agreement-northgate.txt
board-minutes-hartwell.txt

A lease portfolio loaded into the matter, ready for the Lease Abstraction playbook to read it.

Before

Fifty leases into a spreadsheet, two hundred data-room documents screened for a change-of-control clause, a chronology built out of a lever-arch file at eight in the evening because the hearing is Thursday.

You read fifty documents to extract twelve datapoints, and the only quality control on your work is a fee-earner re-reading it, with no working shown.

Handwritten cover notes and scanned deeds from a box do not sort themselves, and a bad scan is still a bad scan whatever reads it.

After

You read a grid of twelve datapoints with the quoted source behind every cell, and spend your time on the eleven cells that look wrong rather than the hundreds that do not.

A fee-earner can see what you found instead of receiving a finished spreadsheet with no working shown, which makes the work you did visible rather than invisible.

A cell that fails is retried on its own, not the whole grid, and a document that is not actually a lease is moved out of scope in ten seconds.

A paralegal at a desk lamp late at night surrounded by boxes of documents.

Grounded on the matter

Documents are converted on upload, PDFs, scans, Word files, and each shows as ready once processed; if one fails, you retry it rather than wondering why the grid looks wrong.

See how matters work

Matters · Project Halcyon · SPA warranties and disclosureOpen

Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure

Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.

Client: Halcyon Bidco Ltd
Reference: WC-2026-0412
Practice area: Corporate / M&A
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Responsible partner: E. Vance

No conflict check on file.

Chat, on this matter

Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.

Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.

Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for

25 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Chat
21 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Run · completed · 560 credits
18 Aug
Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter
Document · indexed
16 Aug
Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement
Document · indexed
4 Aug
Matter opened
Opened

Documents converting on upload, each marked ready before the review grid runs.

A memo, not a chat

Five seeded playbooks, NDA, MSA, M&A due diligence, lease abstraction, employment, or your own columns in plain English, put documents down the side and questions across the top, no prompt to write.

See the review grid

A review grid: documents down the side, questions across the top, and a cited answer in every cell. — Thirty-one leases against the Lease Abstraction playbook, four rent-review cells flagged.

Verified, then shareable

Click a source chip and a panel opens with the document, a Verified against source badge, an Open in document button, and the cited quote itself, which is the one-click checking step for the whole grid.

See how verification works

Authorities · 14 · Where we looked

#	Reference	Source	Verdict
1	Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32	—	not yet checked
2	Working Time Regulations 1998 SI 1998/1833, regs 4 to 5, 10 to 14	—	not yet checked
3	Coppage v Safety Net Security Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1176	—	not yet checked
4	UK GDPR, Articles 6 and 9 Retained Regulation (EU) 2016/679	—	not yet checked
5	Employment Rights Act 1996, s 1 c 18	—	not yet checked
6	Harlow v Artemis International [2008] EWHC 1126 (QB)	—	not yet checked

A source chip clicked open, the quoted wording behind the cell it supports.

Named, not generic.

Each agent is built for one kind of work, carries its own protocols and returns the same six-tab run. These are the ones this desk reaches for.

What a run costs.

Credits are shown on the run and attributed to the matter, but buying more credits is an admin job at your firm, not yours.

See pricing

What you will say before you try it.

What if it gets a cell wrong?: You will see it, because the quote is right there under the source chip. Retry the cell, or open the document; cells that fail can be retried individually rather than rerunning the whole grid.
Can I use it on a matter I am not assigned to?: No. Document retrieval is bounded by permissions, and a restricted matter stays restricted, including in conflict-check results, which show that a restricted matter may conflict without showing you the detail.
Will it tell a fee-earner what I did?: The audit and compliance register records every run and who authorised it, which cuts both ways and mostly in your favour: the work you did is visible instead of invisible.

Nearby desks.

Start free

Put five documents into a review grid and click a source chip.

Ten minutes tells you whether the quote behind each cell holds up.

Start free Book a 20-minute walkthrough