Is Legora's product bad?

No. Their tabular review is a genuine strength and one of the better-regarded surfaces in this category. We compete on what sits around and underneath the grid: the matter, the verification method and the governance register.

What should we test on the same documents?

Load the same five documents into both products. Click into a cell in each and see what it tells you about where the answer came from, then ask each vendor what happens when a citation cannot be confirmed.

Do you offer real-time collaborative drafting?

Sharing on LegalAI Space is matter membership plus passcode links to clients, not real-time co-drafting. If collaborative drafting inside the document is what you need most, weigh that against the governance layer described above.

The same table, and a matter underneath it.

Legora's tabular review is a genuine strength in this category. LegalAI Space puts the same shape of grid inside a matter with a conflict check, an audit register and a per-cell verification method.

Start free Book a 20-minute walkthrough

Legora's Document Review workspace is a well-regarded surface, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. This page describes what LegalAI Space does, so a firm evaluating both can compare like for like; we do not characterise how Legora verifies its own output, which is not ours to describe.

Dimension	LegalAI Space	Legora
Review surface	Document Review grid: documents as rows, questions as columns, seeded playbooks	A tabular review workspace is their best-known surface
Verification, per cell	'Verified against source' with the quoted passage, or 'not addressed' if there is nothing to say	Not something we can state; ask them directly
The matter	Client, reference, partner, practice area, jurisdiction, an automatic conflict check on open	Not something we can state; ask them directly
Governance	Audit and compliance register, CSV export, printable bundle with a content digest	Not something we can state; ask them directly
Regulatory horizon scanning	Six source packs, materiality bands, deadlines, owners, a weekly partner digest	Not something we can state; ask them directly
Entry point	Free tier, two seats, no card	Not something we can state; ask them directly

Legora is a trade mark of its owner and is not affiliated with LegalAI Space or Cognesio LLP. Statements about Legora are drawn from its public materials as understood on the date this page was last reviewed, and may have changed; where we cannot state something, the table says so. Statements about LegalAI Space describe the product as shipped. If you spot an error, write to us and we will correct it.

Verification you can inspect, per cell

In the Document Review grid, a cell carries a 'verified against source' chip, the quoted passage, and a link that opens the document at that point. A cell with nothing to say reads 'not addressed' rather than filling the box with something plausible. Ask any vendor what their equivalent cell shows.

See how document review works

Document Review · Hartwell matter · contract screen0/12 filled

Document	Parties and effective dateTEXT	Term and renewalTEXT	Limitation of liabilityTEXT	Governing lawTEXT
nda-hartwell-meridian.txt
saas-agreement-northgate.txt
board-minutes-hartwell.txt

A grid cell's source panel, with the quote and its verification chip.

The matter, with governance attached

Client, reference, responsible partner, practice area, jurisdiction, key dates and counterparties on one record, with a timeline of documents, runs, share links and conflict checks. The jurisdiction on the matter is enforced: the Jurisdiction Gatekeeper blocks a run that would reach for authorities the matter is not configured for. The audit and compliance register and the printable bundle sit on top. This is the layer a compliance lead asks about.

See how matters work

Matters · Project Halcyon · SPA warranties and disclosureOpen

Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure

Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.

Client: Halcyon Bidco Ltd
Reference: WC-2026-0412
Practice area: Corporate / M&A
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Responsible partner: E. Vance

No conflict check on file.

Chat, on this matter

Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.

Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.

Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for

25 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Chat
21 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Run · completed · 560 credits
18 Aug
Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter
Document · indexed
16 Aug
Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement
Document · indexed
4 Aug
Matter opened
Opened

A matter timeline with the conflict check that runs on open.

Regulatory horizon scanning in the same product

Six source packs, materiality bands, deadlines, owners, matter links and an exportable register, with a weekly partner digest. A firm evaluating a review tool does not usually expect the regulatory watch to already be included.

See horizon scanning

Horizon Scanning · Calder & Finch regulatory radarevery weekday at 7am

Development	Materiality	Published	Deadline
Scanning…

The horizon register, with a materiality band and a deadline on each row.

Questions this page provokes.

Start free

Run the same review on both, and check the cells.

Free plan, two seats, 500 welcome credits, no card.

Start free Book a 20-minute walkthrough