Mid-size firms, 50 to 150 fee-earners
Standardise on one thing your risk committee can inspect.
One firm-wide product, agents by practice area, verification the risk committee can inspect, and a per-seat price you can model without an enterprise quote.
| Document | Governing law | Term | Return of information |
|---|---|---|---|
| NDA: Counterparty A | Verified "This Agreement is governed by English law." | Verified | Needs a check |
| NDA: Counterparty B | Verified | Verified | Needs a check |
| NDA: Counterparty C | Verified | Verified | Needs a check |
A review grid run across practice groups: documents down the side, the clause quoted behind each cell.
The day this changes
Before
At fifty to a hundred and fifty fee-earners you have the problems of a large firm and are small enough that enterprise vendors quote a number designed for somebody else.
A procurement exercise that outlasts the interest: nine months of security questionnaires, and by the time it lands the partners who wanted it have found their own tools.
A pilot that proves nothing: six enthusiasts produce impressive anecdotes and the firm learns nothing about the sceptical litigation partner on a Thursday.
After
One firm-wide product to standardise on, with agents by practice area across the eight or ten groups and a per-seat price you can model.
Verification the risk committee can inspect: closed-list sources, citation verdicts, and an audit register with a content digest.
The Document Review grid and Horizon Scanning run across groups, so the standard is a product in use, not a pilot that proved nothing.
Grounded on the matter
Across eight or ten practice groups, every run happens inside a matter that opens with a conflict check, so conflicts are handled once for the firm rather than per office. The practice agents and the Document Review grid read the documents in the matter, and Matter Intelligence draws on the firm's own work. It is one operational record across the groups, which is what makes standardising on it more than a slogan.
See how matters workClient
Calder & Finch LLP
Reference
CF-2026-0184
Practice area
Employment
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Responsible partner
R. Okafor
Status
Open
Conflict check on open: clear across 214 matters searched.
Clear- Matter opened: conflict check run automatically.
- Documents added: employment contract, board minutes.
- Contract Agent run completed: 6 action items, 14 authorities.
The matter, with the conflict check that runs on open.
A deliverable, not a chat
Agents by practice area return Word deliverables the whole firm recognises, and the Document Review grid handles the volume reading across groups. Set Prepare for and the same run shapes for the client, the board or the court. Standardising on one product means the sceptical litigation partner and the enthusiast get the same deliverable, so a pilot tells you something real about a Thursday.
See the review grid| Document | Governing law | Term | Return of information |
|---|---|---|---|
| NDA: Counterparty A | Verified "This Agreement is governed by English law." | Verified | Needs a check |
| NDA: Counterparty B | Verified | Verified | Needs a check |
| NDA: Counterparty C | Verified | Verified | Needs a check |
A review grid across practice groups, the clause quoted in each cell.
Verified, then shareable
Sources are a closed list, every citation carries a verdict, and the audit register records every run, share and check across the firm, exportable as a spreadsheet or printable as an inspection bundle with a content digest. The risk committee inspects one register, and the firm policy can hold work citing a failed authority until an owner overrides it. Share deliverables through passcode links with every view logged.
See the audit register| Date | Event | Matter | Actor | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02 Sep | Run completed | CF-2026-0184 | R. Okafor | Verified |
| 02 Sep | Client share created | CF-2026-0184 | R. Okafor | Verified |
| 01 Sep | Conflict check | CF-2026-0190 | System | Needs a check |
One register across the firm, exportable for the risk committee.
An agent run over one document costs about 118 credits, about £1.18; a fifty-document pass about £23.40. Billed by matter, observed, not modelled.
See pricingObjections
The price has to make sense.
Per-seat pricing you can read, with usage broken down by matter so you can see what a run cost and decide whether to recharge it. One plan is free.
See pricingOur COLP will not sign this off.
Sources are a closed list, every citation carries a verdict, and every run, share and check sits on a register you can export or print as an inspection bundle.
See the audit registerWe already have Copilot.
A general assistant answers from the open web and will cite a case that does not exist. This works from a closed list of primary law and marks each authority verified, needs a check, or not found.
See how verification worksGive your risk committee one product to inspect.
Twenty minutes, on a demo firm, so they can see the register and the bundle first.