The contract queue, the regulatory reading, and the board note, handled inside the matter.

Triage the contract queue in a review grid, watch the regulators that matter to the business, and turn the analysis into the note the board actually reads.

In-house legal teams, 10 to 50

Start free Book a 20-minute walkthrough

No credit card required

Document Review · Hartwell matter · contract screen0/12 filled

Document	Parties and effective dateTEXT	Term and renewalTEXT	Limitation of liabilityTEXT	Governing lawTEXT
nda-hartwell-meridian.txt
saas-agreement-northgate.txt
board-minutes-hartwell.txt

A vendor queue loaded into the matter, ready for a grid built from your own columns.

Before

Six lawyers and four hundred agreements a year, with no trainee cohort and no paralegal pool to put on the reading.

The board does not want the analysis; it wants the recommendation and the risk, on one page, and a legal memo rarely arrives in that shape on the first try.

Outside counsel spend is scrutinised, and often the honest answer for why a question went out at all is that nobody in the team had time for the first pass.

After

The Contract Agent triages the queue clause by clause against your own positions, quoting the clause and proposing fallback wording, so eleven agreements become six for the grid and five for a proper read.

Horizon Scanning's prebuilt packs run on Free, watching the sector that matters to the business without anyone in the team owning the reading.

Prepare for Executive Brief turns the same analysis into a one-page board note, bottom line first, risks ranked by commercial impact, in about ten minutes of editing.

An in-house legal team of four around a whiteboard of contract diagrams.

Grounded on the matter

Vendor agreements, DPAs and reseller contracts go into the matter, and the Contract Agent reads the actual clause on a training-rights or liability question rather than a general description of what that kind of agreement usually contains.

See how matters work

Matters · Project Halcyon · SPA warranties and disclosureOpen

Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure

Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.

Client: Halcyon Bidco Ltd
Reference: WC-2026-0412
Practice area: Corporate / M&A
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Responsible partner: E. Vance

No conflict check on file.

Chat, on this matter

Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.

Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.

Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for

25 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Chat
21 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Run · completed · 560 credits
18 Aug
Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter
Document · indexed
16 Aug
Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement
Document · indexed
4 Aug
Matter opened
Opened

The contract queue as matters, each agreement read on its own wording.

A memo, not a chat

A batch of vendor contracts goes into a grid under the Commercial Contract / MSA Review or NDA playbook with your own columns added, and a document that does not address a column says so rather than inventing an answer.

See the review grid

A review grid: documents down the side, questions across the top, and a cited answer in every cell. — Eleven vendor agreements against your own columns, six triaged in one pass.

Verified, then shareable

The specific provisions behind a board note are checked before the note is written, and Prepare for Executive Brief cites only the controlling authority, keeping the board pack to about a page.

See how verification works

Authorities · 14 · Where we looked

#	Reference	Source	Verdict
1	Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32	—	not yet checked
2	Working Time Regulations 1998 SI 1998/1833, regs 4 to 5, 10 to 14	—	not yet checked
3	Coppage v Safety Net Security Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1176	—	not yet checked
4	UK GDPR, Articles 6 and 9 Retained Regulation (EU) 2016/679	—	not yet checked
5	Employment Rights Act 1996, s 1 c 18	—	not yet checked
6	Harlow v Artemis International [2008] EWHC 1126 (QB)	—	not yet checked

The controlling authority behind a board note, checked before the note is written.

Named, not generic.

Each agent is built for one kind of work, carries its own protocols and returns the same six-tab run. These are the ones this desk reaches for.

What a run costs.

Usage is metered in credits and attributed to the matter, so the board note about outside counsel spend can sit next to the number for the work done in-house.

See pricing

What you will say before you try it.

We are not a law firm; does the vocabulary even work for us?: The product speaks in matters, clients and responsible partners. In-house teams generally read a matter as a workstream and a client as a business unit, and it works, though it is honest to say the vocabulary was written for firms.
Will our data leave the UK, or end up training someone's model?: No. Files, answers and records are stored in Microsoft Azure UK, with no data leaving the UK region, encrypted in transit and at rest, and never used to train or fine-tune any model.
Can we show our auditors what the team actually did?: Yes. The audit and compliance register covers every run, verification result, share, document and member change, exportable as a spreadsheet or printable as an audit bundle with a content digest.

Nearby desks.

Start free

Put five agreements from the queue into a review grid.

Ten minutes, no card, or book a 20-minute walkthrough and bring the queue.

Start free Book a 20-minute walkthrough