Sole practitioners and boutiques
The associate you cannot afford to hire.
Priced and shaped for a small firm: two seats free, a full plan you can sign on your own authority, and a product that returns a deliverable, not a conversation.
- 1Create the firm and invite your first two seats
- 2Choose a practice profile: it installs the matching agents and horizon packs
- 3Print the confidentiality and data statement for your file
- 4Open your first matter and ask a question
The get-started checklist: create the firm, choose a practice profile, print the data statement, open a matter.
The day this changes
Before
You do the work, you win the work, and you do the admin. There is no knowledge team and no library subscription that would pay for itself.
The larger firm on the other side has a trainee reading the whole data room. You are reading it between two other matters.
There is nobody to hand a first draft to, so a general assistant that returns a conversation does not actually save you the step.
After
Two seats are free with no card, and a full-featured plan is roughly £78 a seat a month that you can sign on your own authority and cancel when you like.
The get-started checklist sets the firm up: create it, choose a practice profile, print the data statement, open your first matter and ask a question.
The product returns a deliverable rather than a conversation, because you do not have anyone to turn the conversation into a deliverable.
Grounded on the matter
Open a matter with the client and the reference, and the conflict check runs on open, the safeguard a solo practice cannot staff. Add the documents and the agent works from them, so you ask against the file rather than re-explaining the background. Every run and chat attaches to the client, which is the filing and the audit trail you would otherwise keep by hand between two other matters.
See how matters work- 1Create the firm and invite your first two seats
- 2Choose a practice profile: it installs the matching agents and horizon packs
- 3Print the confidentiality and data statement for your file
- 4Open your first matter and ask a question
The checklist that stands the firm up: create it, pick a profile, open a matter.
A deliverable, not a chat
Run the Contract or Research Agent and what comes back is a memo you can send: a summary, action items, an authorities tab and a Word download. Set Prepare for a Client Update and it is in plain English for the client. Because there is no one to turn a chat into a document, the product does that step for you, which is the point when you are the whole firm.
See the agentsContract Agent Completed
Senior Associate Employment Contract: English Law Review
Calder & Finch LLP · Employment · CF-2026-0184
Summary
Overall risk is HIGH. The UK/Ireland/EU non-compete is likely unenforceable, while the holiday carry-over cap and blanket data/monitoring consent require replacement; the remaining covenants, working-time opt-out and bonus clause should be narrowed and clarified.
- 1. Clause 9(c), non-compete: High: the 12-month prohibition on working for any law firm anywhere in the UK, Ireland or EU is wider than reasonably necessary.§ Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32
- 2. Clause 11, data and monitoring: High: blanket contractual consent is not an adequate basis for general employment processing or unrestricted monitoring.§ UK GDPR
A memo with a summary, action items and a Word download.
Verified, then shareable
Every authority is fetched from a closed list of free primary sources and marked verified, needs a check, or not found, so you do not need a library subscription to stand behind a citation. Read the verdicts, then share the memo with the client through a passcode link that logs every view. The checking a bigger firm gives a trainee is done before you rely on the answer.
See how verification works| Authority | Where | Source | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employment Rights Act 1996, s.1 | Statutory particulars | legislation.gov.uk | Verified |
| Working Time Regulations 1998, regs 13 and 13A | Clause 4 | legislation.gov.uk | Verified |
| Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32 | Clause 9(c) | supremecourt.uk | Verified |
| Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] AC 688 | Clause 9(a) | N/A | Not found |
| ICO: monitoring workers guidance | Clause 11 | ico.org.uk | Needs a check |
| Equality Act 2010, s.39 | Clause 12 | legislation.gov.uk | Needs a check |
The authorities behind a run, each with its verdict.
A single agent run over one document costs about 118 credits, about £1.18, on top of a plan around £78 a seat a month. Observed, not a saving claim.
See pricingObjections
The price has to make sense.
Per-seat pricing you can read, with usage broken down by matter so you can see what a run cost and decide whether to recharge it. One plan is free.
See pricingWe already have Copilot.
A general assistant answers from the open web and will cite a case that does not exist. This works from a closed list of primary law and marks each authority verified, needs a check, or not found.
See how verification worksOur documents are confidential.
Files sit in Microsoft Azure UK, encrypted in transit and at rest, scoped to the matter, and never used to train a model. The security statement sets out the detail.
Read the security statementStand your firm up with the checklist.
Two seats free, 500 welcome credits, no card.