LegalAI[Space]

Built for a different firm, on purpose.

Harvey is an enterprise platform for the largest international firms. LegalAI Space is priced, shaped and verified for firms of five to a few hundred lawyers, wherever their matters are.

We are not the enterprise option, and we do not try to be. A firm with a dedicated innovation team, a multi-year procurement horizon and a mature document management estate has a different shopping list from a 25-lawyer firm in Bristol. This page describes what LegalAI Space does and lets the comparison speak for itself; it does not characterise how Harvey works internally, which we are not in a position to describe.

DimensionLegalAI SpaceHarvey
Built forFirms of five to a few hundred lawyers, and in-house teams of 10 to 50Large international firms and enterprise legal functions
Getting startedSelf-serve, free tier, two seats, no card, a first run inside minutesEnterprise sale with an implementation team, typically
JurisdictionsAny jurisdiction, set per matter. Verified source lists cover the UK, Ireland, the EU and the ECHR todayNot something we can state; ask them directly
Source policy74 approved public domains, ranked by authority, published in full on this siteNot published anywhere we can cite
PricingPublished in US dollars on the pricing page, from $0Not published anywhere we can cite

Harvey is a trade mark of its owner and is not affiliated with LegalAI Space or Cognesio LLP. Statements about Harvey are drawn from its public materials as understood on the date this page was last reviewed, and may have changed; where we cannot state something, the table says so. Statements about LegalAI Space describe the product as shipped. If you spot an error, write to us and we will correct it.

01

A source list you can read

Every cited passage is checked against a fixed list of approved public sources, ranked so that courts and legislation come before regulators and official publishers. Any firm evaluating either product can ask to see the list of domains research is allowed to fetch from. Ours is on the verification page; ask any vendor for theirs.

See how verification works
Authorities · 14 · Where we looked
#ReferenceVerdict
1

Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

[2019] UKSC 32
not yet checked
2

Working Time Regulations 1998

SI 1998/1833, regs 4 to 5, 10 to 14
not yet checked
3

Coppage v Safety Net Security Ltd

[2013] EWCA Civ 1176
not yet checked
4

UK GDPR, Articles 6 and 9

Retained Regulation (EU) 2016/679
not yet checked
5

Employment Rights Act 1996, s 1

c 18
not yet checked
6

Harlow v Artemis International

[2008] EWHC 1126 (QB)
not yet checked
The allow-list and the verdict on every authority a run relies on.

02

Matter-native governance out of the box

Matter facts, timeline, an automatic conflict check on open with restricted-matter redaction, an audit and compliance register, CSV export and a printable bundle with a content digest. A firm without a dedicated risk department gets a risk function without a separate purchase.

Read the governance page
Audit register · Calder & Finch LLP · last 24 hours
5 of 8 entries · digest sha-256
TimeWhoTypeEntryMatter
09:36j.okaforDocumentDisclosure_letter_v4.docx uploaded · 18 pagesHAL-2026-0031
09:30e.vanceConflict checkConflict check on open · no matches across 38 mattersRC-2026-0009
09:12adminMemberp.hartley added · role: Associate · 4 mattersWorkspace
08:55r.chenRunDue Diligence Agent · review grid · 12 documentsHAL-2026-0031
08:40r.chenVerificationVerify all · 6 authorities · 6 verifiedHAL-2026-0031
Exports carry a content digest so a reviewer can confirm nothing was edited after the fact.
One audit register row for a run, a share and a conflict check.

03

A price a firm can sign itself

Free is a real tier: two seats, 500 welcome credits, no card. Paid plans start at $39 per seat per month. There is no implementation phase and no annual commitment to negotiate before a fee-earner gets a first answer back.

See pricing
Matters · Project Halcyon · SPA warranties and disclosureOpen

Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure

Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.

Client
Halcyon Bidco Ltd
Reference
WC-2026-0412
Practice area
Corporate / M&A
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Responsible partner
E. Vance
No conflict check on file.

Chat, on this matter

Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.

Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.

Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for
  1. 25 Aug

    Disclosure exceptions matrix

    Chat

  2. 21 Aug

    Disclosure exceptions matrix

    Run · completed · 560 credits

  3. 18 Aug

    Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter

    Document · indexed

  4. 16 Aug

    Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement

    Document · indexed

  5. 4 Aug

    Matter opened

    Opened

What a run costs, broken down by matter.

Questions this page provokes.

Start free

See what a 25-lawyer firm actually gets.

Book a 20-minute walkthrough and bring a real matter.