LegalAI[Space]
NewExplore source coverage

Private AI workspace for
legal research.

Research, contracts, review and drafting inside the matter. Sources ranked by authority, every citation checked, a memo a partner can sign.

Start freeBook a 20-minute walkthrough

No credit card required

Matters · 14 Rowan Court, Flat 9 · ResearchSources ranked
Matter: 14 Rowan CourtEngland and WalesResearch Agent
 
Prepare for: Court-Ready · Deliver as: Word

Where we looked

  • 1Your documentsLease, demand, correspondence
  • 2Primary law3 statutes, 1 judgment
  • 3Regulators and the recordNothing needed
  • 4Web searchOff for this question

Authorities · 4

  • 1

    Law of Property Act 1925, s 146

    c 20
    not yet checked
  • 2

    Housing Act 1996, s 81

    c 52
    not yet checked
  • 3

    Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, s 168

    c 15
    not yet checked
  • 4

    Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson

    [1996] QB 231 (CA)
    not yet checked

Interactive preview · sample matter

A question asked inside the matter. The answer arrives with numbered authorities; Verify all checks each one against a public source.

Work you can sign.

Ask inside the matter. The agent plans, passes the gates, ranks its sources and checks every citation. What comes back is a memo with its authorities, for a supervising lawyer to sign.

  1. Ask inside the matter.

    A question, a contract, a data room. The matter already knows the client, the jurisdiction and the documents, so nothing has to be re-explained.

Scroll to walk the steps, or click one
Matters · Calder & Finch LLP · Senior associate contract
Matter: CF-2026-0184EmploymentEngland and Wales2 documents
We act for Calder & Finch LLP. Review the attached senior associate employment contract against a fair-and-enforceable playbook and propose redlines.
BalancedPrepare for: Work-Stream Memo
Run Contract Agent
New

It proposes the change. You apply it as a tracked change.

LegalAI Space for Word sits beside the document you have open. Ask about it and the answer points at the paragraph. Ask it to change a clause and it shows exactly what would go and what would come in. Apply puts it in as a Word tracked change, attributed to you; Skip leaves it alone. Same workspace, same credits, same verification.

See the Word add-in
Hartwell services agreement v4.docx
FileHomeInsertDrawDesignLayoutReferencesReviewViewHelp
LegalAI [ Space ]

Services Agreement

This Services Agreement is made on the Effective Date between Northwind Consulting Limited (the Supplier) and Contoso Holdings plc (the Customer).

2. Fees. The Customer shall pay the Fees within 30 days of receipt of a valid invoice. Late payments accrue interest at 4% above the Bank of England base rate.

3. Insurance. The Supplier shall maintain the insurances set out in Schedule 3 for the term and for two years after it ends.

4. Liability. Neither party excludes liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence, fraud, or any liability that cannot be excluded by law. Subject to that, the Supplier's total liability under this Agreement is limited to the Fees paid in the 12 months preceding the claim.

5. Term. This Agreement continues for an initial term of 24 months and renews for successive 12-month periods unless either party gives notice.

LegalAI Space
LegalAI [ Space ]
Calder & Finch LLP
Hartwell services agreement · Hartwell Holdings plc
AssistantActionsDocument
Selection · 286 chars
Ask about this document…
Page 1 of 3Track Changes: On
  • 01Cites the paragraph. Click ¶5 and Word selects it.
  • 02Every applied edit is a real Word revision: accept, reject, compare, send to the other side.
  • 03Installed from a manifest your IT deploys from the Microsoft 365 admin centre. Runs in Word on the web, Windows and Mac.

Every answer ranks its sources.

A search engine hands back whatever ranks. The workspace sorts what it finds by authority before a word is written: your documents, then primary law, then regulators and the official record, and only then the open web, labelled as such. The order is fixed in code and shown under Where we looked.

What a search returns

in the order it came back

  1. 1Law firm blog post on restrictive covenantsWeb · open web
  2. 2Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32Judgment · supremecourt.uk
  3. 3Senior associate employment contractYour document · on the matter
  4. 4ICO guidance: monitoring workersRegulator · ico.org.uk
  5. 5Encyclopaedia entry: non-compete clauseWeb · open web
  6. 6Working Time Regulations 1998, regs 13 to 13ALegislation · legislation.gov.uk
  7. 7Board minute, 14 AugustYour document · on the matter
  8. 8Hansard: Employment Rights Bill, second readingOfficial record · hansard.parliament.uk

What the workspace uses

ranked by authority, shown under Where we looked

01Your documentsRead first. The matter is the context.
    02Primary lawJudgments and legislation from the official publisher.
      03Regulators and the recordRules, guidance, enforcement, Parliament, gazettes.
        04Web search, labelledOnly when asked for. Ranked, gated and marked as open web.

          Sorting what came back, most authoritative first.

          Verified source list
          United Kingdom, Ireland, European Union, ECHR, international bodies
          Citation style and jurisdiction gate
          United States (Bluebook), plus your firm's house style anywhere
          Web search, same gates
          Everywhere, labelled honestly
          See coverage by jurisdiction

          Every citation, checked at the source before you read it.

          Citation verification takes each authority the model cites and holds it against the place it was published: does the record exist, does the quoted passage appear word for word, is the match strong enough, is the publisher approved. Four gates, enforced in code. The verdict is one of three words: verified, needs a check, not found.

          How verification works

          Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

          [2019] UKSC 32 · supremecourt.uk

          not yet checked
          1. 1Record existsDoes the citation point at a real record on the source?checking
          2. 2Quote is verbatimDoes the quoted passage appear in the record, word for word?
          3. 3Match is strong enoughIs the match above the floor the firm relies on?
          4. 4Approved sourceDoes the link resolve on a publisher from the approved list?

          Holding the authority against the source it claims to come from.

          Agents that finish the work.

          A chat answers a question. An agent takes a task through to a memo: it reads the matter, plans, retrieves, checks, drafts and records how it did it. Pick one to see what to hand it and what comes back.

          Research Agent

          Plans the question, retrieves from primary law and drafts an answer with every authority checked.

          The Research Agent works in passes rather than a single prompt. It plans the question, decides which class of source answers each part, retrieves from primary law and the regulators' own handbooks, runs a treatment pass over every case it relies on, reads the firm's own documents on the matter, and only then drafts. An authority arrives labelled with a treatment signal: good law, followed, applied, distinguished, explained, considered, doubted, overruled, or needs a check. A doubted or overruled authority caps the confidence of the section that relies on it.

          Hand it

          • Answer a point of law with authorities cited and verified
          • Produce a court-ready research memo with OSCOLA pinpoints
          • Check whether a case relied on in a draft is still good law

          Best for

          • Litigation associates needing rapid, defensible case research with treatment signals.
          • Regulatory lawyers tracking cross-border obligations and rule diffs.
          • Partners who need an audit log per research turn for SRA defensibility, following Ayinde v Haringey.

          What comes back

          A memo with a summary, the authorities relied on with verdicts and treatment signals, open questions, and How this was made.

          How the Research Agent works41 worked workflows
          Every agent

          Ask a legal question. Get a memo whose every authority has been checked.

          Legal research is where a general AI tool fails a lawyer, so it is where the most care went. Your question is handed to eleven specialist sub-agents in four stages: plan, retrieve, check, draft. A citator reads how every case has since been treated. A fact checker holds every claim against your file. Then four gates run in code before you see a word.

          How the Research Agent works
          Treatment signals
          Good law, followed, applied, distinguished, doubted, overruled or unverified, with the citing cases.
          Pinpoint references
          Paragraph and section numbers, in the citation style of the jurisdiction.
          Court-ready shape
          Question presented, short answer, authorities, analysis, counter-arguments, open questions.
          Research Agent · how a question becomes a memo
          Your questionOrchestrator
          1. 1Plan2
          2. 2Retrieve3
          3. 3Check5
          4. 4Draft1
          Four gates, in codeRecord existsQuote is verbatimMatch is strong enoughApproved source
          Memo, with verdicts
          01/11

          Query Planner. Decomposes the question into three to eight ordered sub-questions, each tagged with jurisdiction and source class.

          Know what the regulators changed before your clients ask.

          Pick the regulators, courts and sectors that matter to your clients, in the jurisdictions you work in. Each development arrives banded by how much it matters, with the key date it implies and an owner. Prebuilt source packs are on every plan, including Free; custom watches and the weekly partner digest come with the paid plans.

          See Horizon Scanning
          • Every development banded by how much it matters, so the noise stays out of the inbox
          • Key dates and deadlines pulled out and put on the matter they affect
          • From a development to a drafted client update in one run
          Horizon Scanning · Calder & Finch regulatory radarevery weekday at 7am
          DevelopmentMaterialityDeadline
          Scanning…

          The frontier models, with the same gates on every one.

          Run the model your firm trusts, and set a different default for chat, agents, skills and document vision. Whichever model answers, the same verification runs on what it writes, and the same record is kept.

          Keys, retention and where prompts go
          • OpenAI GPT-5.6
          • Anthropic Claude
          • Google Gemini
          • Azure OpenAI
          • Any OpenAI-compatible model

          Built for legal work anywhere.

          A matter carries its own jurisdiction. Where an approved source list exists, every citation is checked against it. Where one does not exist yet, research runs at open-web quality with the same gates, and the memo says so.

          Verified source list
          Every citation checked against a public source
          Citation style and jurisdiction gate
          House style applied; sources ranked from the open web
          Open-web research, same gates
          Ranked sources, honest labelling
          Coverage by jurisdiction
          • England and Walesverified list
          • Scotlandverified list
          • Northern Irelandverified list
          • Irelandverified list
          • European Unionverified list
          • Council of Europeverified list
          • EU member statesverified list
          • International bodiesverified list
          • United Statesstyle + gate
          • Everywhere elseopen web

          Take a piece of work, and walk it through.

          An NDA arrives with the board minutes that discussed it. The matter opens, the conflict check runs, both documents go on the file, the Contract Agent reads them together, and the mismatch between the governing law and the jurisdiction clause comes back first, with the minute that raised it. Every workflow below is written to that standard: what you upload, what the agent does, what comes back, what the supervising lawyer checks.

          1. 01Review an NDA against the board minutesA mutual NDA and the board minutes that discussed it go into one matter. The question is not whether the NDA is standard, it is whether it matches what the board decided, and that means reading both documents together.Research Agent · Contract AgentEngland and Wales6 steps
          2. 02Due diligence, a per-document red-flag gridA data room ahead of a Series B investment is turned into a table: documents down the side, questions across the top, one cell per intersection, each carrying the quote it came from.Due Diligence AgentEngland and Wales6 steps
          3. 03Review the warranties and limitations in a share purchase agreementA seller's draft share purchase agreement for Halcyon Bidco is read as two documents that have to agree with each other: the warranty schedule and the limitations clause. The memo pairs each warranty with the cap, basket and time limit that actually applies to it.Contract Agent · Research AgentEngland and Wales6 steps
          4. 04Build a disclosure letter against the agreed warrantiesSellers of Northgate Analytics have agreed the warranty schedule and now have to disclose against it. The grid runs the room against the warranties, then the letter is drafted from the cells that came back with something to say.Due Diligence Agent · Drafting AgentEngland and Wales6 steps
          5. 05Turn a completion checklist into owned action itemsTwo weeks out from completion on the sale of Redgate Aggregates, the checklist is a spreadsheet nobody trusts. The run reads it against the conditions precedent in the agreement and returns the same list with owners, evidence and outstanding gaps attached.Due Diligence Agent · Matter Intelligence AgentEngland and Wales5 steps
          6. 06Review a shareholders agreement under Irish company lawA minority investor is taking twenty-two per cent of an Irish private company and wants to know what the shareholders agreement actually gives them. The review reads the agreement and the constitution together, because a reserved matter that the constitution contradicts is worth very little.Contract Agent · Cross-Jurisdictional ComparatorIreland5 steps
          All 7 in Corporate and M&AEvery workflow

          Straight answers.

          All questions
          Start free

          See what comes back on your own document.

          Two seats free, no card. Add a contract, ask a question, press Verify all.

          Start freeView pricing