Drafting a response to the SRA or the FCA
An SRA letter asks eight numbered questions on supervision and AI use, with a firm deadline. The Regulator Response preset answers exactly what is asked, in the order asked, with a chronology and candid acknowledgement where the file has a gap.
Compliance and regulatory · COLP, risk partner, compliance lead, general counsel
- Agents
- Research, Compliance & Regulatory
- First draft
- Two grounded research answers in under a minute each, then a first draft the COLP can work on the same day.
The problem
Step 01 of 06
Open the matter
The SRA letter, the firm's file notes, the client care letter under scrutiny, the complaints log entry and the firm's AI use policy are added.
Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure
Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.
- Client
- Halcyon Bidco Ltd
- Reference
- WC-2026-0412
- Practice area
- Corporate / M&A
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Responsible partner
- E. Vance
No conflict check on file.Chat, on this matter
Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.
Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.
Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for- 25 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Chat
- 21 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Run · completed · 560 credits
- 18 Aug
Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter
Document · indexed
- 16 Aug
Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement
Document · indexed
- 4 Aug
Matter opened
Opened
Step 02 of 06
Check what is engaged
Which parts of the SRA Standards and Regulations apply, and what the SRA has published on technology and COLP responsibility, come back with named publications and case references.
Matter: 14 Rowan CourtEngland and WalesResearch AgentPrepare for: Court-Ready · Deliver as: WordWhere we looked
- 1Your documentsLease, demand, correspondence
- 2Primary law3 statutes, 1 judgment
- 3Regulators and the recordNothing needed
- 4Web searchOff for this question
Authorities · 4
- 1not yet checked
Law of Property Act 1925, s 146
c 20 - 2not yet checked
Housing Act 1996, s 81
c 52 - 3not yet checked
Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, s 168
c 15 - 4not yet checked
Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson
[1996] QB 231 (CA)
Step 03 of 06
Establish the chronology
A dated chronology is built from the firm's own file notes, flagging a gap in the record rather than leaving it for the regulator to notice.
Matter: 14 Rowan CourtEngland and WalesResearch AgentPrepare for: Court-Ready · Deliver as: WordWhere we looked
- 1Your documentsLease, demand, correspondence
- 2Primary law3 statutes, 1 judgment
- 3Regulators and the recordNothing needed
- 4Web searchOff for this question
Authorities · 4
- 1not yet checked
Law of Property Act 1925, s 146
c 20 - 2not yet checked
Housing Act 1996, s 81
c 52 - 3not yet checked
Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, s 168
c 15 - 4not yet checked
Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson
[1996] QB 231 (CA)
Step 04 of 06
Draft the response
The Compliance & Regulatory Agent runs with Prepare for: Regulator Response, answering each numbered question under its own heading, with the chronology and a candid note on the file gap.
Agent
Jurisdiction
Prepare for
Deliver as
Instruction
What should the agent look for?Documents
Drop a contract, or pick one from the matter
Also on the matter
- Offer_letter_v3.pdf2 pages
- Staff_handbook_2025.docx61 pages
- Board_minute_14_Aug.pdf3 pages
Platform model · zero data retention · audit register onStep 05 of 06
Attach the register as an annex
A printable audit bundle for the relevant period covers runs, verification results, sharing, documents, members and conflict checks.
5 of 8 entries · digest sha-256Time Who Type Entry Matter 09:36 j.okafor Document Disclosure_letter_v4.docx uploaded · 18 pages HAL-2026-0031 09:30 e.vance Conflict check Conflict check on open · no matches across 38 matters RC-2026-0009 09:12 admin Member p.hartley added · role: Associate · 4 matters Workspace 08:55 r.chen Run Due Diligence Agent · review grid · 12 documents HAL-2026-0031 08:40 r.chen Verification Verify all · 6 authorities · 6 verified HAL-2026-0031 Exports carry a content digest so a reviewer can confirm nothing was edited after the fact.Step 06 of 06
Sign off
The COLP works through the draft as a first draft, not a submission, and the managing partner signs off before it is downloaded.
6 items need your confirmation14 authorities · Where we lookedSenior Associate Employment Contract: English Law Review
Summary
- 1.
Clause 9(c), non-competeHigh
The 12-month prohibition on working for any law firm anywhere in the UK, Ireland or EU, in any capacity, is almost certainly wider than reasonably necessary and therefore unlikely to be enforceable.
Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32 - 2.
Clause 11, data and monitoringHigh
Blanket contractual consent is not an adequate basis for general employment processing, special-category data or unrestricted monitoring.
UK GDPR, Arts 6 and 9 - 3.
Clause 4, holiday carry-overHigh
The unconditional five-day cap conflicts with mandatory carry-over rights where sickness, statutory leave or employer failure prevents leave being taken.
Working Time Regulations 1998, regs 13 to 13A
- 1.
A document, not a transcript.
- A numbered draft answering each question in the order the regulator asked it.
- A dated chronology built from the firm's own file notes, with any gap acknowledged and the remediation dated.
- References to the specific SRA Code provisions and named SRA publications engaged.
- A printable audit bundle with a content digest, attachable as an annex.
Authorities it checks
- SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs
- SRA Code of Conduct for Firms
- SRA Risk Outlook report on the use of artificial intelligence in the legal market (November 2023)
- SRA thematic review of compliance officers (December 2025)
- SRA guidance update on new technology and COLP responsibility (February 2026)
- Ayinde v London Borough of Haringey; Al-Haroun v Qatar National Bank (Divisional Court, June 2025)
What it does not do
- It does not submit the response. The draft is worked by the COLP and signed off by the managing partner before anything is sent.
- It does not soften the acknowledgement of a file-note gap; the instruction is to state it and set out the remediation with dates.
- The bundle carries a content digest, not a compliance certificate and not a tamper-evident hash chain.