LegalAI[Space]

Every rent, term and break clause in a portfolio, quoted from the lease itself.

Load the portfolio into a review grid, apply the Lease Abstraction playbook, and read every term, rent and break clause quoted from the lease it came from.

Property and real estate

Document Review · Hartwell matter · contract screen0/12 filled
DocumentParties and effective dateTEXTTerm and renewalTEXTLimitation of liabilityTEXTGoverning lawTEXT
nda-hartwell-meridian.txt
saas-agreement-northgate.txt
board-minutes-hartwell.txt
Thirty leases down the side, ten columns across the top, the break clause quoted in the one that is wrong.

Before

A portfolio acquisition means the same twelve datapoints across every lease, and the only quality control on a spreadsheet like the one behind Aldgate Mills' break clause and dilapidations position is a second fee-earner re-reading the first one's work.

The point of law that turns up on a Thursday afternoon, relief from forfeiture or a 1954 Act contracting-out that may not have been done properly, needs a real authority, not a plausible one.

A general assistant will answer a forfeiture question fluently and cite Billson or Shiloh Spinners to a paragraph that does not say what it claims.

After

The Lease Abstraction playbook reads a portfolio like Aldgate Mills' into a grid: premises, term, rent, escalations, break, alienation, each cell quoted against the lease clause.

The Due Diligence Agent works the title pack and the replies to enquiries and returns red flags tied to the document and clause, not a general description of what a title review usually finds.

The Research Agent answers the forfeiture question with the Law of Property Act 1925, the County Courts Act 1984 and Billson, each authority checked against the source before the memo reaches you.

A property lawyer on a construction site with a surveyor, holding rolled plans.

01

Grounded on the matter

Load thirty leases into the matter and the Lease Abstraction playbook reads them, not a template of what a commercial lease usually contains. On an Aldgate Mills-shaped portfolio, the upward-only review clause at the wrong cycle is quoted against the actual lease, not assumed.

See how matters work
Matters · Project Halcyon · SPA warranties and disclosureOpen

Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure

Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.

Client
Halcyon Bidco Ltd
Reference
WC-2026-0412
Practice area
Corporate / M&A
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Responsible partner
E. Vance
No conflict check on file.

Chat, on this matter

Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.

Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.

Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for
  1. 25 Aug

    Disclosure exceptions matrix

    Chat

  2. 21 Aug

    Disclosure exceptions matrix

    Run · completed · 560 credits

  3. 18 Aug

    Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter

    Document · indexed

  4. 16 Aug

    Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement

    Document · indexed

  5. 4 Aug

    Matter opened

    Opened

The matter for a lease portfolio, with the conflict check that runs the day it opens.

02

A memo, not a chat

Ten columns, documents down the side, term dates and escalations across the top, no prompt written. A partner reviewing row thirty-four clicks the cell rather than reopening the lease, and the finished grid exports as the completion checklist.

See the review grid
Document Review · Hartwell matter · contract screen
A review grid: documents down the side, questions across the top, and a cited answer in every cell.
Thirty leases against ten columns, the break clause quoted in the one that is wrong.

03

Verified, then shareable

The Law of Property Act 1925 section 146(11), the County Courts Act 1984 section 138, and Billson, Shiloh Spinners and Toms v Ruberry each carry a verdict before the forfeiture memo is finished. Share the report on title as a passcode link with a seven-day expiry, logged on the matter.

See how verification works
Authorities · 14 · Where we looked
#ReferenceVerdict
1

Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

[2019] UKSC 32
not yet checked
2

Working Time Regulations 1998

SI 1998/1833, regs 4 to 5, 10 to 14
not yet checked
3

Coppage v Safety Net Security Ltd

[2013] EWCA Civ 1176
not yet checked
4

UK GDPR, Articles 6 and 9

Retained Regulation (EU) 2016/679
not yet checked
5

Employment Rights Act 1996, s 1

c 18
not yet checked
6

Harlow v Artemis International

[2008] EWHC 1126 (QB)
not yet checked
Billson and Shiloh Spinners, checked against the source before the forfeiture memo relies on them.

What a run costs.

Each abstraction and each research run is metered in credits and stamped to the matter, so a portfolio review shows its own cost before the file closes.

See pricing

What you will say before you try it.

Forty leases is a lot to trust to a first pass.
Every cell in the grid carries the quoted clause behind it, marked Verified against source, and a document that does not address a column says Not addressed rather than a plausible guess. You check the quote, not the summary.
See the review grid
A forfeiture citation has to be real.
Agents fetch from an approved list of public primary-law sources, and a quoted passage must appear verbatim in the source before it passes the quote-verbatim gate. Anything that fails is flagged, not passed through.
See how verification works
Scanned leases from the 1990s are half our files.
PDFs, scanned images and Word documents are converted on upload. A bad scan is still a bad scan; where a figure cannot be read the grid says so rather than inventing one.
Read the security statement
Start free

Grid one of your own lease portfolios.

Ten minutes, no card. Load three leases and apply the Lease Abstraction playbook.