Skip to content
LegalAI Space

Private client

Trust deeds read, points researched, drafts produced, and nothing said that cannot be checked.

The product reads the file, answers the narrow point with the authority checked, and drafts the document, and it does not decide anything for you.

Client

Calder & Finch LLP

Reference

CF-2026-0184

Practice area

Employment

Jurisdiction

England and Wales

Responsible partner

R. Okafor

Status

Open

Conflict check on open: clear across 214 matters searched.

Clear
  1. Matter opened: conflict check run automatically.
  2. Documents added: employment contract, board minutes.
  3. Contract Agent run completed: 6 action items, 14 authorities.

A private client matter with the conflict check that runs when the file opens.

The day this changes

Before

Private client work is precise, personal and slow to delegate. A file can run for thirty years, and the documents are often old, often scanned, often the only copy.

Somebody sits with six deeds, four wills and a 1998 letter of wishes before anyone can advise.

The questions are narrow but unforgiving: does this clause create an interest in possession, what did the 2016 deed of appointment actually do.

After

The Research Agent reads the family's paperwork inside the matter and answers the point with the deed quoted and the authority marked.

The Drafting Agent produces the document you ask for, attributed to its sources, for a solicitor to settle.

Every matter opens with a conflict check, which matters when the same family appears across trusts, wills and a company.

Grounded on the matter

Open the matter and load the deeds, the wills and the correspondence, and the agent reads the documents in the file, including the scanned ones. Ask what the 2016 deed of appointment did and it quotes the operative clause rather than describing a specimen. The conflict check runs on open, which is the safeguard that counts when one family runs across several matters over decades.

See how matters work

Client

Calder & Finch LLP

Reference

CF-2026-0184

Practice area

Employment

Jurisdiction

England and Wales

Responsible partner

R. Okafor

Status

Open

Conflict check on open: clear across 214 matters searched.

Clear
  1. Matter opened: conflict check run automatically.
  2. Documents added: employment contract, board minutes.
  3. Contract Agent run completed: 6 action items, 14 authorities.

The private client matter, with the conflict check on open.

A deliverable, not a chat

The run returns a note with the point answered and the deed quoted, or a draft produced by the Drafting Agent, not a chat reply. Set Prepare for a Client Update and the same analysis comes back in plain English for the family. Every draft is attributed to its sources and marked for a qualified lawyer, so what you hand on is a document to settle, not a transcript to rewrite.

See the agents

Contract Agent Completed

Senior Associate Employment Contract: English Law Review

Calder & Finch LLP · Employment · CF-2026-0184

Summary

Overall risk is HIGH. The UK/Ireland/EU non-compete is likely unenforceable, while the holiday carry-over cap and blanket data/monitoring consent require replacement; the remaining covenants, working-time opt-out and bonus clause should be narrowed and clarified.

  1. 1. Clause 9(c), non-compete: High: the 12-month prohibition on working for any law firm anywhere in the UK, Ireland or EU is wider than reasonably necessary.§ Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32
  2. 2. Clause 11, data and monitoring: High: blanket contractual consent is not an adequate basis for general employment processing or unrestricted monitoring.§ UK GDPR
Where we looked10 verified · 2 need a check · 2 not found

A private client note with the point answered and the source quoted.

Verified, then shareable

Where a point turns on statute or a case, the authority is fetched from the approved primary-law sources and marked verified, needs a check, or not found, with a Where we looked panel. Read the verdicts, then share the note with the family through a passcode link that logs every view on the matter. Nothing said in the note goes out without a source you can check first.

See client sharing

Share link

share.legalaispace.com/r/9k2m-…Passcode set

Expires

7 days

Views logged

3

  1. client@calderfinch.exampleOpened, 09:14
  2. client@calderfinch.exampleOpened, 14:02

A passcode share link to the client, with every view logged.

A research run over a private client file costs about the same order as a single-document run, about £1 to a few pounds. Observed, not a saving claim.

See pricing

Objections

Our documents are confidential.

Files sit in Microsoft Azure UK, encrypted in transit and at rest, scoped to the matter, and never used to train a model. The security statement sets out the detail.

Read the security statement

Our COLP will not sign this off.

Sources are a closed list, every citation carries a verdict, and every run, share and check sits on a register you can export or print as an inspection bundle.

See the audit register

We already have Copilot.

A general assistant answers from the open web and will cite a case that does not exist. This works from a closed list of primary law and marks each authority verified, needs a check, or not found.

See how verification works

Read one of your own trust files.

Free plan, two seats, 500 welcome credits, no card.