LegalAI[Space]

Review an NDA against the board minutes

A mutual NDA and the board minutes that discussed it go into one matter. The question is not whether the NDA is standard, it is whether it matches what the board decided, and that means reading both documents together.

Corporate and M&A · Corporate fee-earner, supervising partner

Start freeBook a walkthrough
Agents
Research, Contract
First draft
A clause-level chat answer in under a minute, then a Work-Stream Memo the supervising partner can sign the same day.

The problem

Six weeks after signature, someone has to check the NDA before the definitive agreement goes out. The board minutes record that counsel raised a mismatch between the jurisdiction clause and the governing law clause, but the NDA itself does not say so. A read of the NDA alone will not catch it.

  1. Step 01 of 06

    Open the matter

    A new matter takes the client, the reference, the responsible partner, the counterparty and the jurisdiction. The conflict check runs on save, matching names across every matter, party and document in the firm.

    Matters · Project Halcyon · SPA warranties and disclosureOpen

    Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure

    Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.

    Client
    Halcyon Bidco Ltd
    Reference
    WC-2026-0412
    Practice area
    Corporate / M&A
    Jurisdiction
    England and Wales
    Responsible partner
    E. Vance
    No conflict check on file.

    Chat, on this matter

    Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.

    Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.

    Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for
    1. 25 Aug

      Disclosure exceptions matrix

      Chat

    2. 21 Aug

      Disclosure exceptions matrix

      Run · completed · 560 credits

    3. 18 Aug

      Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter

      Document · indexed

    4. 16 Aug

      Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement

      Document · indexed

    5. 4 Aug

      Matter opened

      Opened

  2. Step 02 of 06

    Add the NDA and the board minutes

    Both documents convert to clean text so the agents can quote a passage rather than guess at one.

    Matters · Project Halcyon · SPA warranties and disclosureOpen

    Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure

    Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.

    Client
    Halcyon Bidco Ltd
    Reference
    WC-2026-0412
    Practice area
    Corporate / M&A
    Jurisdiction
    England and Wales
    Responsible partner
    E. Vance
    No conflict check on file.

    Chat, on this matter

    Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.

    Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.

    Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for
    1. 25 Aug

      Disclosure exceptions matrix

      Chat

    2. 21 Aug

      Disclosure exceptions matrix

      Run · completed · 560 credits

    3. 18 Aug

      Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter

      Document · indexed

    4. 16 Aug

      Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement

      Document · indexed

    5. 4 Aug

      Matter opened

      Opened

  3. Step 03 of 06

    Ask the question in the matter

    With the matter chip set to this file, ask whether the NDA is consistent with the board minutes and unusual for a mutual NDA in this sector. The answer opens with a clause-level list, the governing law and jurisdiction mismatch first.

    Matters · 14 Rowan Court, Flat 9 · ResearchSources ranked
    Matter: 14 Rowan CourtEngland and WalesResearch Agent
     
    Prepare for: Court-Ready · Deliver as: Word

    Where we looked

    • 1Your documentsLease, demand, correspondence
    • 2Primary law3 statutes, 1 judgment
    • 3Regulators and the recordNothing needed
    • 4Web searchOff for this question

    Authorities · 4

    • 1

      Law of Property Act 1925, s 146

      c 20
      not yet checked
    • 2

      Housing Act 1996, s 81

      c 52
      not yet checked
    • 3

      Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, s 168

      c 15
      not yet checked
    • 4

      Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson

      [1996] QB 231 (CA)
      not yet checked

  4. Step 04 of 06

    Turn it into a memo

    The Contract Agent runs with Prepare for: Work-Stream Memo and Deliver as: Word, producing a marked-up recommendation for each clause and a draft variation letter for the jurisdiction clause.

    Agents · Contract Agent · New runMatter: Northgate · senior associate hire

    Agent

    Jurisdiction

    Prepare for

    Deliver as

    Instruction

    What should the agent look for?

    Documents

    Drop a contract, or pick one from the matter

    Also on the matter

    • Offer_letter_v3.pdf2 pages
    • Staff_handbook_2025.docx61 pages
    • Board_minute_14_Aug.pdf3 pages
    Platform model · zero data retention · audit register on

  5. Step 05 of 06

    Read the memo

    The completed run carries a summary, action items, authorities and open questions, plus How this was made.

    Agents · Contract Agent · Employment Contract Compliance ReviewCompleted
    6 items need your confirmation14 authorities · Where we looked

    Senior Associate Employment Contract: English Law Review

    Summary

    1. 1.

      Clause 9(c), non-competeHigh

      The 12-month prohibition on working for any law firm anywhere in the UK, Ireland or EU, in any capacity, is almost certainly wider than reasonably necessary and therefore unlikely to be enforceable.

      Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32
    2. 2.

      Clause 11, data and monitoringHigh

      Blanket contractual consent is not an adequate basis for general employment processing, special-category data or unrestricted monitoring.

      UK GDPR, Arts 6 and 9
    3. 3.

      Clause 4, holiday carry-overHigh

      The unconditional five-day cap conflicts with mandatory carry-over rights where sickness, statutory leave or employer failure prevents leave being taken.

      Working Time Regulations 1998, regs 13 to 13A

  6. Step 06 of 06

    Sign off

    The supervising partner ticks the action items and clicks Verify all before putting a name to the memo.

    Agents · Contract Agent · Employment Contract Compliance ReviewCompleted

    • Replace the UK/Ireland/EU non-compete with a 3 to 6 month restriction tied to competing corporate-law work.

    • Replace blanket data consent with a lawful-basis clause and a separate monitoring notice.

    • Remove the five-day carry-over cap and reference the statutory carry-over rules.

    • Narrow the client non-solicit to clients dealt with in the final 12 months.

    • Add an explicit working-time opt-out withdrawal mechanism.

    • Confirm the bonus clause states the discretion is exercised in good faith.

A document, not a transcript.

  • A clause-level list flagging the governing law and jurisdiction mismatch between clauses 8.1 and 8.2, tied to the board minute that raised it.
  • Notes on the confidentiality term, the non-solicit length, the archival copy wording and the absence of a residuals clause.
  • A marked-up recommendation for each clause and a draft variation letter for the jurisdiction clause.
  • Action items with owners, and open questions that refine the run when answered.

Authorities it checks

  • Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
Every source it may cite

What it does not do

  • It does not negotiate with the other side. The memo and the variation letter are drafts for a fee-earner to send.
  • It only reads documents that are on the matter. A minute or a side letter not uploaded will not be caught.
  • Where its own drafting turns entirely on the parties' commercial choice, it flags the point rather than making the call.

Related

Run this on your own document

Free plan, two seats, no card.
Start freeBook a 20-minute walkthrough