A paralegal's first week
A paralegal joins the corporate team on Monday and by Friday has run a research question, filled a 378-cell due diligence grid, hit the limit of what a paralegal seat can do, and produced a memo the partner signs off.
Practice management · Paralegal, trainee, supervising associate, practice manager
- Agents
- Research, Contract, Due Diligence
- First draft
- A checked chat answer inside a day one; a supervised memo by the end of the week.
The problem
Step 01 of 05
Join and ask the first question
The paralegal lands on a shorter member checklist and answers a change-of-control question on the customer contracts, with source chips the associate checks.
Matter: 14 Rowan CourtEngland and WalesResearch AgentPrepare for: Court-Ready · Deliver as: WordWhere we looked
- 1Your documentsLease, demand, correspondence
- 2Primary law3 statutes, 1 judgment
- 3Regulators and the recordNothing needed
- 4Web searchOff for this question
Authorities · 4
- 1not yet checked
Law of Property Act 1925, s 146
c 20 - 2not yet checked
Housing Act 1996, s 81
c 52 - 3not yet checked
Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, s 168
c 15 - 4not yet checked
Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson
[1996] QB 231 (CA)
Step 02 of 05
Run the grid
A 378-cell due diligence grid is filled unattended; the paralegal sorts by red flags and writes the covering note on the fourteen exceptions.
Document Parties and effective dateTEXT Term and renewalTEXT Limitation of liabilityTEXT Governing lawTEXT nda-hartwell-meridian.txt saas-agreement-northgate.txt board-minutes-hartwell.txt Step 03 of 05
Hit the limit
A research answer on an unrelated matter needs the paralegal to be added to it first; sharing a run to a client and signing off remain fee-earner and partner actions.
Matter: 14 Rowan CourtEngland and WalesResearch AgentPrepare for: Court-Ready · Deliver as: WordWhere we looked
- 1Your documentsLease, demand, correspondence
- 2Primary law3 statutes, 1 judgment
- 3Regulators and the recordNothing needed
- 4Web searchOff for this question
Authorities · 4
- 1not yet checked
Law of Property Act 1925, s 146
c 20 - 2not yet checked
Housing Act 1996, s 81
c 52 - 3not yet checked
Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, s 168
c 15 - 4not yet checked
Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson
[1996] QB 231 (CA)
Step 04 of 05
Produce a supervised memo
The Contract Agent runs a memo on the NDA against the board minutes; the paralegal answers the open questions they can and re-runs it, but does not tick the action items.
Agent
Jurisdiction
Prepare for
Deliver as
Instruction
What should the agent look for?Documents
Drop a contract, or pick one from the matter
Also on the matter
- Offer_letter_v3.pdf2 pages
- Staff_handbook_2025.docx61 pages
- Board_minute_14_Aug.pdf3 pages
Platform model · zero data retention · audit register onStep 05 of 05
Close the week
The matter timeline shows the week in order for the file notes, and the billing page's cost-by-matter panel shows where the week's usage went.
5 of 8 entries · digest sha-256Time Who Type Entry Matter 09:36 j.okafor Document Disclosure_letter_v4.docx uploaded · 18 pages HAL-2026-0031 09:30 e.vance Conflict check Conflict check on open · no matches across 38 matters RC-2026-0009 09:12 admin Member p.hartley added · role: Associate · 4 matters Workspace 08:55 r.chen Run Due Diligence Agent · review grid · 12 documents HAL-2026-0031 08:40 r.chen Verification Verify all · 6 authorities · 6 verified HAL-2026-0031 Exports carry a content digest so a reviewer can confirm nothing was edited after the fact.
A document, not a transcript.
- A checked chat answer with source chips, verified by the associate in minutes rather than read from scratch.
- A completed due diligence grid with the exceptions sorted and a covering note.
- A Work-Stream Memo with the action items left for the fee-earner and partner to confirm.
- A matter timeline recording the whole week in order, for the paralegal's own file notes.
Authorities it checks
- Law of Property Act 1925, s.146(11)
- County Courts Act 1984, s.138
- Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd
- Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding
- Toms v Ruberry
What it does not do
- A paralegal cannot see a matter they are not on, and cannot share a run to a client or tick its action items.
- It does not remove supervision. The product makes the supervisor's check cheap enough to actually do, it does not replace it.
- It does not let a junior seat sign off a memo; that action stays with the fee-earner and the partner.