LegalAI[Space]

Commercial contracts · Cross-border commercial team, in-house counsel

Work out an agent's termination payment across the EU

A manufacturer wants to end an agency arrangement that covers France, Germany, Spain and the Netherlands under one agreement. The question is what termination costs, and the answer differs by member state even though the directive is common.

Start freeBook a walkthrough
Agents
Research, Cross-Jurisdictional Comparator
First draft
A four-jurisdiction comparison table arrives from one run, before the board decides the notice date.

The problem

The directive sets a floor and member states built different things on top of it. An indemnity capped at one year's average commission in one state sits beside an uncapped compensation approach in another, and the agreement's choice of law does not necessarily displace either. Deciding the notice date without knowing the range is how a board approves a number it later has to revise.

  1. Step 01 of 05

    Record four jurisdictions on one matter

    The matter carries the EU as its jurisdiction with France, Germany, Spain and the Netherlands as the states in scope, and the agency agreement is uploaded with its commission schedules.

    Matters · Project Halcyon · SPA warranties and disclosureOpen

    Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure

    Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.

    Client
    Halcyon Bidco Ltd
    Reference
    WC-2026-0412
    Practice area
    Corporate / M&A
    Jurisdiction
    England and Wales
    Responsible partner
    E. Vance
    No conflict check on file.

    Chat, on this matter

    Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.

    Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.

    Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for
    1. 25 Aug

      Disclosure exceptions matrix

      Chat

    2. 21 Aug

      Disclosure exceptions matrix

      Run · completed · 560 credits

    3. 18 Aug

      Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter

      Document · indexed

    4. 16 Aug

      Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement

      Document · indexed

    5. 4 Aug

      Matter opened

      Opened

  2. Step 02 of 05

    Ask the comparison question

    Whether the agent takes indemnity or compensation in each state, how each is calculated, what notice is required, and whether the agreement can contract out of any of it.

    Matters · 14 Rowan Court, Flat 9 · ResearchSources ranked
    Matter: 14 Rowan CourtEngland and WalesResearch Agent
     
    Prepare for: Court-Ready · Deliver as: Word

    Where we looked

    • 1Your documentsLease, demand, correspondence
    • 2Primary law3 statutes, 1 judgment
    • 3Regulators and the recordNothing needed
    • 4Web searchOff for this question

    Authorities · 4

    • 1

      Law of Property Act 1925, s 146

      c 20
      not yet checked
    • 2

      Housing Act 1996, s 81

      c 52
      not yet checked
    • 3

      Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, s 168

      c 15
      not yet checked
    • 4

      Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson

      [1996] QB 231 (CA)
      not yet checked

  3. Step 03 of 05

    Read the comparison run

    The Cross-Jurisdictional Comparator runs with Prepare for: Executive Brief and Deliver as: spreadsheet, returning one row per state with the basis, the cap, the notice period and the local implementing measure.

    Agents · Contract Agent · New runMatter: Northgate · senior associate hire

    Agent

    Jurisdiction

    Prepare for

    Deliver as

    Instruction

    What should the agent look for?

    Documents

    Drop a contract, or pick one from the matter

    Also on the matter

    • Offer_letter_v3.pdf2 pages
    • Staff_handbook_2025.docx61 pages
    • Board_minute_14_Aug.pdf3 pages
    Platform model · zero data retention · audit register on

  4. Step 04 of 05

    Check the authorities and treatment

    The directive articles carry their verdicts, and the Citator shows treatment signals on the case law relied on for the calculation approach.

    Authorities · 14 · Where we looked
    #ReferenceVerdict
    1

    Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

    [2019] UKSC 32    		not yet checked
    2

    Working Time Regulations 1998

    SI 1998/1833, regs 4 to 5, 10 to 14    		not yet checked
    3

    Coppage v Safety Net Security Ltd

    [2013] EWCA Civ 1176    		not yet checked
    4

    UK GDPR, Articles 6 and 9

    Retained Regulation (EU) 2016/679    		not yet checked
    5

    Employment Rights Act 1996, s 1

    c 18    		not yet checked
    6

    Harlow v Artemis International

    [2008] EWHC 1126 (QB)    		not yet checked

  5. Step 05 of 05

    Take the decision list

    Action items set out the notice date options, the total exposure range across the four states, and the two facts the client has to confirm about the agent's customer base.

    Agents · Contract Agent · Employment Contract Compliance ReviewCompleted

    • Replace the UK/Ireland/EU non-compete with a 3 to 6 month restriction tied to competing corporate-law work.

    • Replace blanket data consent with a lawful-basis clause and a separate monitoring notice.

    • Remove the five-day carry-over cap and reference the statutory carry-over rules.

    • Narrow the client non-solicit to clients dealt with in the final 12 months.

    • Add an explicit working-time opt-out withdrawal mechanism.

    • Confirm the bonus clause states the discretion is exercised in good faith.

What comes back

A document, not a transcript.

  • One row per member state showing the compensation basis, the calculation, the minimum notice and the implementing measure.
  • An exposure range across the four states, with the assumptions behind each end of it written out.
  • A note on whether the choice of law clause changes any of the four answers, and where it does not.
  • Open questions on the agent's customer list and on commission accrued but unpaid at termination.

Authorities it checks

  • Council Directive 86/653/EEC, arts 17 and 18
  • Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993, SI 1993/3053
Every source it may cite

What it does not do

  • It does not serve notice or calculate a final payment figure; the range depends on facts the client has yet to confirm.
  • It does not replace local counsel on the procedural steps in each state, and it says which points need them.
  • It reads the agreement supplied. Local addenda signed with the agent's subsidiaries would change the answer and are named as missing.

Related

Run this on your own document

Free plan, two seats, no card.
Start freeBook a 20-minute walkthrough