LegalAI[Space]

In-house and operations · Group general counsel, company secretary, subsidiary directors

Prepare a board paper on directors' duties in Australia

A UK group has appointed two London executives to the board of its Australian subsidiary and neither has served on an Australian board before. The paper sets out what the duties require of them in practice, and says how the research was sourced.

First draft
A board paper draft comes back from one run, a fortnight before the meeting papers go out.

The problem

Directors appointed to an overseas subsidiary usually receive a one-page induction and a set of accounts. The care and diligence standard is personal, and a director who relies on a group process without understanding it is the one exposed. A board paper written in the language of the local statute, rather than a summary of English duties with a note attached, is what the appointment actually needs.
  1. Step 01 of 05

    Record the jurisdiction and what that means

    The matter records Australia, and the run panel states that research here draws on ranked open-web sources while the same citation gates apply.

    Matters · Project Halcyon · SPA warranties and disclosureOpen

    Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure

    Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.

    Client
    Halcyon Bidco Ltd
    Reference
    WC-2026-0412
    Practice area
    Corporate / M&A
    Jurisdiction
    England and Wales
    Responsible partner
    E. Vance
    No conflict check on file.

    Chat, on this matter

    Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.

    Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.

    Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for
    1. 25 Aug

      Disclosure exceptions matrix

      Chat

    2. 21 Aug

      Disclosure exceptions matrix

      Run · completed · 560 credits

    3. 18 Aug

      Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter

      Document · indexed

    4. 16 Aug

      Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement

      Document · indexed

    5. 4 Aug

      Matter opened

      Opened

  2. Step 02 of 05

    Ask the practical question

    What the care and diligence standard requires of a non-resident director, what reliance on management is permitted, and where the group's own reporting would not be enough.

    Matters · 14 Rowan Court, Flat 9 · ResearchSources ranked
    Matter: 14 Rowan CourtEngland and WalesResearch Agent
     
    Prepare for: Court-Ready · Deliver as: Word

    Where we looked

    • 1Your documentsLease, demand, correspondence
    • 2Primary law3 statutes, 1 judgment
    • 3Regulators and the recordNothing needed
    • 4Web searchOff for this question

    Authorities · 4

    • 1

      Law of Property Act 1925, s 146

      c 20
      not yet checked
    • 2

      Housing Act 1996, s 81

      c 52
      not yet checked
    • 3

      Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, s 168

      c 15
      not yet checked
    • 4

      Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson

      [1996] QB 231 (CA)
      not yet checked
  3. Step 03 of 05

    Draft the board paper

    Prepare for: Executive Brief, Deliver as: Word. The paper is written for directors rather than lawyers, with the duties stated and then applied to how this board actually operates.

    Agents · Contract Agent · New runMatter: Northgate · senior associate hire

    Agent

    Jurisdiction

    Prepare for

    Deliver as

    Instruction

    What should the agent look for?

    Documents

    Drop a contract, or pick one from the matter

    Also on the matter

    • Offer_letter_v3.pdf2 pages
    • Staff_handbook_2025.docx61 pages
    • Board_minute_14_Aug.pdf3 pages
    Platform model · zero data retention · audit register on
  4. Step 04 of 05

    Check the citations and the labels

    Each citation carries a verdict, and Where we looked sets out the ranked sources so the paper does not present open-web material as verified primary law.

    Authorities · 14 · Where we looked
    #ReferenceVerdict
    1

    Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

    [2019] UKSC 32
    not yet checked
    2

    Working Time Regulations 1998

    SI 1998/1833, regs 4 to 5, 10 to 14
    not yet checked
    3

    Coppage v Safety Net Security Ltd

    [2013] EWCA Civ 1176
    not yet checked
    4

    UK GDPR, Articles 6 and 9

    Retained Regulation (EU) 2016/679
    not yet checked
    5

    Employment Rights Act 1996, s 1

    c 18
    not yet checked
    6

    Harlow v Artemis International

    [2008] EWHC 1126 (QB)
    not yet checked
  5. Step 05 of 05

    Sign off with the caveat intact

    The general counsel confirms the sourcing note survives into the Word download before the paper is circulated with the meeting pack.

    Agents · Contract Agent · Employment Contract Compliance ReviewCompleted
    6 items need your confirmation14 authorities · Where we looked

    Senior Associate Employment Contract: English Law Review

    Summary

    1. 1.

      Clause 9(c), non-competeHigh

      The 12-month prohibition on working for any law firm anywhere in the UK, Ireland or EU, in any capacity, is almost certainly wider than reasonably necessary and therefore unlikely to be enforceable.

      Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32
    2. 2.

      Clause 11, data and monitoringHigh

      Blanket contractual consent is not an adequate basis for general employment processing, special-category data or unrestricted monitoring.

      UK GDPR, Arts 6 and 9
    3. 3.

      Clause 4, holiday carry-overHigh

      The unconditional five-day cap conflicts with mandatory carry-over rights where sickness, statutory leave or employer failure prevents leave being taken.

      Working Time Regulations 1998, regs 13 to 13A

What comes back

A document, not a transcript.

  • The duties stated in the local statutory language and then applied to how this board actually meets and decides.
  • A practical note on reliance: what a director can rely on management for and what they cannot.
  • Three changes to the board's own reporting pack that would support the standard.
  • A sourcing statement on the face of the paper describing how the research was ranked.

Authorities it checks

  • Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 180
  • Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 181
Every source it may cite

What it does not do

  • Research for this jurisdiction runs at open-web quality with the same gates; the memo says so. Verified source lists cover the UK, Ireland, the EU and the ECHR today.
  • It does not replace local counsel on the subsidiary's specific regulatory position.
  • It does not circulate the board pack or minute the meeting.

Run this on your own document

Free plan, two seats, no card.