In-house and operations · Group general counsel, company secretary, subsidiary directors
Prepare a board paper on directors' duties in Australia
A UK group has appointed two London executives to the board of its Australian subsidiary and neither has served on an Australian board before. The paper sets out what the duties require of them in practice, and says how the research was sourced.
The problem
Step 01 of 05
Record the jurisdiction and what that means
The matter records Australia, and the run panel states that research here draws on ranked open-web sources while the same citation gates apply.
Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure
Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.
- Client
- Halcyon Bidco Ltd
- Reference
- WC-2026-0412
- Practice area
- Corporate / M&A
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Responsible partner
- E. Vance
No conflict check on file.Chat, on this matter
Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.
Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.
Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for- 25 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Chat
- 21 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Run · completed · 560 credits
- 18 Aug
Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter
Document · indexed
- 16 Aug
Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement
Document · indexed
- 4 Aug
Matter opened
Opened
Step 02 of 05
Ask the practical question
What the care and diligence standard requires of a non-resident director, what reliance on management is permitted, and where the group's own reporting would not be enough.
Matter: 14 Rowan CourtEngland and WalesResearch AgentPrepare for: Court-Ready · Deliver as: WordWhere we looked
- 1Your documentsLease, demand, correspondence
- 2Primary law3 statutes, 1 judgment
- 3Regulators and the recordNothing needed
- 4Web searchOff for this question
Authorities · 4
- 1not yet checked
Law of Property Act 1925, s 146
c 20 - 2not yet checked
Housing Act 1996, s 81
c 52 - 3not yet checked
Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, s 168
c 15 - 4not yet checked
Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson
[1996] QB 231 (CA)
Step 03 of 05
Draft the board paper
Prepare for: Executive Brief, Deliver as: Word. The paper is written for directors rather than lawyers, with the duties stated and then applied to how this board actually operates.
Agent
Jurisdiction
Prepare for
Deliver as
Instruction
What should the agent look for?Documents
Drop a contract, or pick one from the matter
Also on the matter
- Offer_letter_v3.pdf2 pages
- Staff_handbook_2025.docx61 pages
- Board_minute_14_Aug.pdf3 pages
Platform model · zero data retention · audit register onStep 04 of 05
Check the citations and the labels
Each citation carries a verdict, and Where we looked sets out the ranked sources so the paper does not present open-web material as verified primary law.
# Reference Source Verdict 1 Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd
[2019] UKSC 32— not yet checked 2 Working Time Regulations 1998
SI 1998/1833, regs 4 to 5, 10 to 14— not yet checked 3 Coppage v Safety Net Security Ltd
[2013] EWCA Civ 1176— not yet checked 4 UK GDPR, Articles 6 and 9
Retained Regulation (EU) 2016/679— not yet checked 5 Employment Rights Act 1996, s 1
c 18— not yet checked 6 Harlow v Artemis International
[2008] EWHC 1126 (QB)— not yet checked Step 05 of 05
Sign off with the caveat intact
The general counsel confirms the sourcing note survives into the Word download before the paper is circulated with the meeting pack.
6 items need your confirmation14 authorities · Where we lookedSenior Associate Employment Contract: English Law Review
Summary
- 1.
Clause 9(c), non-competeHigh
The 12-month prohibition on working for any law firm anywhere in the UK, Ireland or EU, in any capacity, is almost certainly wider than reasonably necessary and therefore unlikely to be enforceable.
Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32 - 2.
Clause 11, data and monitoringHigh
Blanket contractual consent is not an adequate basis for general employment processing, special-category data or unrestricted monitoring.
UK GDPR, Arts 6 and 9 - 3.
Clause 4, holiday carry-overHigh
The unconditional five-day cap conflicts with mandatory carry-over rights where sickness, statutory leave or employer failure prevents leave being taken.
Working Time Regulations 1998, regs 13 to 13A
- 1.
What comes back
A document, not a transcript.
- The duties stated in the local statutory language and then applied to how this board actually meets and decides.
- A practical note on reliance: what a director can rely on management for and what they cannot.
- Three changes to the board's own reporting pack that would support the standard.
- A sourcing statement on the face of the paper describing how the research was ranked.
Authorities it checks
- Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 180
- Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 181
What it does not do
- Research for this jurisdiction runs at open-web quality with the same gates; the memo says so. Verified source lists cover the UK, Ireland, the EU and the ECHR today.
- It does not replace local counsel on the subsidiary's specific regulatory position.
- It does not circulate the board pack or minute the meeting.