Employment · Employment team, HR director, in-house counsel
Plan a collective redundancy consultation timetable
Delmere Care Group is proposing to close two sites and ninety roles are at risk across three establishments. The run works out whether collective consultation is triggered, at which establishment, and what the timetable has to look like counted back from the first intended dismissal.
- Agents
- Research, Employment
- First draft
- A dated timetable arrives from one run, early enough to move the announcement if the arithmetic requires it.
The problem
Step 01 of 05
Record the establishments and the numbers
The matter carries the three sites, the headcount at risk at each, the proposed first dismissal date and the proposed announcement date.
Project Halcyon: SPA warranties and disclosure
Buy-side warranty review, disclosure analysis and cited due-diligence grid.
- Client
- Halcyon Bidco Ltd
- Reference
- WC-2026-0412
- Practice area
- Corporate / M&A
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Responsible partner
- E. Vance
No conflict check on file.Chat, on this matter
Compare warranties with the disclosure letter.
Three high-priority exceptions require action: the unregistered charge, the change-of-control right and the tribunal claim.
Send a message… (@ to mention tools)BalancedPrepare for- 25 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Chat
- 21 Aug
Disclosure exceptions matrix
Run · completed · 560 credits
- 18 Aug
Project Halcyon: Disclosure Letter
Document · indexed
- 16 Aug
Project Halcyon: Share Purchase Agreement
Document · indexed
- 4 Aug
Matter opened
Opened
Step 02 of 05
Ask the trigger question
Whether the twenty and one hundred thresholds are met at each establishment, and whether the sites can be aggregated on these facts.
Matter: 14 Rowan CourtEngland and WalesResearch AgentPrepare for: Court-Ready · Deliver as: WordWhere we looked
- 1Your documentsLease, demand, correspondence
- 2Primary law3 statutes, 1 judgment
- 3Regulators and the recordNothing needed
- 4Web searchOff for this question
Authorities · 4
- 1not yet checked
Law of Property Act 1925, s 146
c 20 - 2not yet checked
Housing Act 1996, s 81
c 52 - 3not yet checked
Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, s 168
c 15 - 4not yet checked
Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson
[1996] QB 231 (CA)
Step 03 of 05
Build the counted-back timetable
The Employment Agent runs on the Thorough tier with Prepare for: Work-Stream Memo, producing every date from the notification through to the first dismissal, working backwards from the fixed end date.
Agent
Jurisdiction
Prepare for
Deliver as
Instruction
What should the agent look for?Documents
Drop a contract, or pick one from the matter
Also on the matter
- Offer_letter_v3.pdf2 pages
- Staff_handbook_2025.docx61 pages
- Board_minute_14_Aug.pdf3 pages
Platform model · zero data retention · audit register onStep 04 of 05
Read the exposure if the dates slip
The memo states what a protective award would look like against this headcount, and what happens to the timetable if the announcement moves by a fortnight.
6 items need your confirmation14 authorities · Where we lookedSenior Associate Employment Contract: English Law Review
Summary
- 1.
Clause 9(c), non-competeHigh
The 12-month prohibition on working for any law firm anywhere in the UK, Ireland or EU, in any capacity, is almost certainly wider than reasonably necessary and therefore unlikely to be enforceable.
Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32 - 2.
Clause 11, data and monitoringHigh
Blanket contractual consent is not an adequate basis for general employment processing, special-category data or unrestricted monitoring.
UK GDPR, Arts 6 and 9 - 3.
Clause 4, holiday carry-overHigh
The unconditional five-day cap conflicts with mandatory carry-over rights where sickness, statutory leave or employer failure prevents leave being taken.
Working Time Regulations 1998, regs 13 to 13A
- 1.
Step 05 of 05
Hand over the owned dates
Each date becomes an action item with an owner in HR or the legal team, and the two facts the client must confirm about the election of representatives are left as open questions.
Replace the UK/Ireland/EU non-compete with a 3 to 6 month restriction tied to competing corporate-law work.
Replace blanket data consent with a lawful-basis clause and a separate monitoring notice.
Remove the five-day carry-over cap and reference the statutory carry-over rules.
Narrow the client non-solicit to clients dealt with in the final 12 months.
Add an explicit working-time opt-out withdrawal mechanism.
Confirm the bonus clause states the discretion is exercised in good faith.
What comes back
A document, not a transcript.
- A trigger analysis per establishment with the aggregation question answered on the facts given.
- A dated timetable counted back from the first intended dismissal, including the notification deadline.
- An exposure note on protective awards at this headcount, with the assumptions stated.
- Open questions on whether existing representatives can be used or an election is required.
Authorities it checks
- Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, s 188
- Employment Rights Act 1996, s 139
What it does not do
- It does not run the consultation meetings or draft the notification form for submission.
- It does not decide whether the sites are one establishment where the facts are genuinely open; it names what would settle it.
- It does not select individuals for redundancy or score a selection matrix.