Partners

You have the trust. We have the product behind it.

Law firms are asking their consultants, brokers and IT providers what to do about AI. Most of you have the relationship and the credibility, and nothing to put behind the answer. That is the gap worth closing together.

See what your firms would get

Four ways in

Where the overlap actually is.

Each of these already reaches the firms we serve. None of them currently has a governance product to hand over.

Compliance consultancies

Your methodology, continuously enforced.

You write the AI policy, run the risk assessment and set the firm's framework. What you cannot do is watch whether any of it is followed on a Tuesday afternoon. We turn your methodology into controls that run on every AI-assisted task, and produce the evidence that shows your advice was implemented rather than filed.

A fit if

  • You already advise SRA-regulated firms on governance and risk
  • You have no AI product behind the advice, and no wish to build one
  • Your firms keep asking what to actually do about AI

PI brokers

A better answer than 'we have a policy'.

Proposal forms are asking about AI, and most of your firms are answering from memory. A co-branded evidence pack turns that into records: which tools, what proportion of AI-assisted citations verified, who signed off. Better submissions make your job easier and your book more defensible.

A fit if

  • You place professional indemnity cover for solicitors
  • Your clients are struggling with the AI questions on the form
  • You want a renewal conversation that is not only about price

Legal IT providers and MSPs

The governance layer above the stack you already run.

You manage the firm's infrastructure, so you own security. Governance is the adjacent question you are increasingly asked and cannot currently answer: not whether the data is safe, but whether the AI output was supervised. It is a margin line on every firm you already onboard.

A fit if

  • You run infrastructure or security for multiple law firms
  • Clients are asking you about AI risk, not just AI tooling
  • You want an add-on that does not require you to become a compliance practice

Practice management and DMS marketplaces

The governance listing your catalogue is missing.

Your marketplace lists the AI tools. None of them governs the others, and none produces the record a COLP needs. A governance listing makes the rest of the catalogue safer to adopt, which is in everyone's interest including yours.

A fit if

  • You run a practice-management, DMS or legal-app marketplace
  • Your catalogue already carries AI tools
  • Your customers ask you whether those tools are safe to use

How it works

Three steps, and none of them is a nine-month procurement.

01

A conversation, not a form

We work out together whether there is a real overlap. If your firms are not in our range, or governance is not a question they are asking you, we will say so.

02

A pilot with one or two of your firms

Before anything is signed. You see what the record actually looks like, and so do they.

03

Commercials that reflect who does the work

Referral, resale or co-delivery, depending on how involved you want to be. We will be specific about numbers in the first conversation rather than after three.

Questions

Partnering, answered.

The questions consultancies, brokers and MSPs ask before the first call.

Still have questions? Talk to the founder
Yes, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. Where a partner brought the firm, that is respected in the commercials and in the relationship. We would rather set that out plainly at the start than have you discover the edge cases later.

From the blog

What your firms are actually facing

Useful context to send a client, and the argument behind the product.

Tell us how you reach law firms.

We will come back with how a partnership would actually work, including the commercials, rather than a brochure.

Try the readiness check yourself